MSI H61M-P20/W8 (MS-7788)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7788
MotherboardMSI H61M-P20/W8 (MS-7788)  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130929
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 23:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 84.2
2-Core 123
61% 97.4 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 182
26% 194 Pts
64-Core 216
13% 216 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3563) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Lighting 33.4
Reflection 25.4
Parallax 35.8
27% 31.5 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 42.1
Splatting 27
29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$26
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 131 126 132 64 13 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.8% Below average
Read 135
Write 131
Mixed 130
SusWrite 102
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 29.5
4K Mixed 17
73% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 65.2
DQ Mixed 62.5
44% 54.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD38G16002 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 15.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-P20/W8 (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 85 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P20/W8 (MS-7788)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback