TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.32% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus Z9PE-D8 WS  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Z9PE-D8 WS
Memory124.2 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.9 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 07 '19 at 07:12
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W v2
Socket-R 2011, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 93.6
1-Core 102
2-Core 206
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 812
72% 612 Pts
64-Core 2,080
129% 2,080 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 85%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6670
Sapphire(174B E194) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
7.32% Terrible
Lighting 9.3
Reflection 9.12
Parallax 7.22
8% 8.54 fps
MRender 8.95
Gravity 6.47
Splatting 9.26
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 7.32%
 Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
842GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1984 1985 1624 1558 1561 1539 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 2,150
Write 1949
Mixed 1,641
SusWrite 1,709
419% 1,862 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53.7
178% 65.9 MB/s
DQ Read 650
DQ Write 448
DQ Mixed 601
435% 566 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 270%
 Great: 410%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7
8GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.6 9.6 11 9.6 9.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
21.9% Poor
Read 117
Write 16.4
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 9.9
32% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
46% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑
This bench: 21.9%
 Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0-YK 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 85.3
MC Write 41
MC Mixed 45.1
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 7.1
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 138%
 Great: 107%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z9PE-D8 WS Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Asus Z9PE-D8 WS

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples20x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples16x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples15x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples14x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples14x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples10x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples12x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung  $175Bench 95%, 73,119 samples11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples10x
RAM
M393B1G73QH0-YK 8x8GBSamsungBench 81%, 8 samples7x
HMT31GR7EFR4C-R 7x8GBHynixBench 91%, 9 samples7x
9905403-582.A00 8x8GBKingstonBench 85%, 7 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $361
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback