Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 06 '19 at 12:32
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User CRI-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3970X-$250
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 95.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
80% 138 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 673
66% 542 Pts
64-Core 807
50% 807 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
EVGA(3842 1335) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 4.04
Parallax 1.16
3% 2.93 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 2.35
2% 3.14 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SQ500S37240G 240GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 213 209 251 219 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.9% Average
Read 261
Write 114
Mixed 156
SusWrite 226
42% 189 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 17.7
67% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 42.6
DQ Write 45.1
DQ Mixed 39.1
31% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
120% Outstanding
MC Read 49.6
MC Write 48.9
MC Mixed 43.7
135% 47.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 120%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback