HPE ML10Gen9

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	90.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	HPE ML10Gen9 (all builds)
Motherboard	HPE ML10Gen9
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160119
Uptime	5.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 05 '19 at 22:34
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	35%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5 3,017 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	67.9% Good	Memory 83 1-Core 97.7 2-Core 191 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 296 8-Core 356 42% 326 Pts	64-Core 378 23% 378 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Nvidia(10DE 119D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67 Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	90.2% Outstanding	Lighting 117 Reflection 124 Parallax 104 96% 115 fps	MRender 83.7 Gravity 114 Splatting 94.2 80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 90.2% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 470 Series SSD 256GB 462 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: AXM09B1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 208 192 77 79 83 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 231 Write 220 Mixed 192 SusWrite 139 44% 196 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 40.5 4K Mixed 17.2 64% 23.8 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 25.1 38% 72.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 53%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$64 4,260 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 3.5TB free Firmware: 01.01K03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 119 119 119 118 117 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	78.7% Very good	Read 156 Write 152 Mixed 100 SusWrite 118 97% 132 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.1 222% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 78.7% Great: 96%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 189 190 190 189 190 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 220 Write 169 Mixed 97.3 SusWrite 189 124% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.4 139% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GU7AFR8N-TF 2x8GB 455 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	72.6% Very good	MC Read 26.3 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 24.8 76% 26.5 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 23.5 SC Mixed 20.2 54% 18.8 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ML10Gen9 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: HPE ML10Gen9

CPU
Xeon E3-1225 v5IntelBench 74%, 3,017 samples	53x
Core i3-6100Intel $40Bench 55%, 110,166 samples	6x
Xeon E3-1280 v5IntelBench 79%, 88 samples	3x

GPU
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	24x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	4x

SSD
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $38Bench 179%, 78,255 samples	4x
240GB 240GBOSCBench 68%, 197 samples	4x
Raid 1 Volume 500GBIntelBench 146%, 1,321 samples	2x

RAM
HMA81GU7MFR8N-TF 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 82 samples	12x
18ASF2G72AZ-2G1B1 Kingston 9965745-028.A00G 18ASF2G72AZ-2G1B1 Kingston 9965745-028.A00G 64GBMicronBench 73%, 4 samples	4x
HMA81GU7MFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 66%, 19 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16