HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10
Memory29.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '19 at 09:53
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3418 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 87.8
43% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 183
25% 184 Pts
64-Core 178
11% 178 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 48%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Marvell Raid VD 6TB
985GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 215 232 211 238 226 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 243
Write 219
Mixed 90
SusWrite 225
142% 194 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1
291% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 135%
Great: 208%
SKYMEDI USB Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 8628
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 12 12 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Read 18.8
Write 10.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 11.5
14% 11.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-033.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 15.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback