Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	32.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6700-$199 5,273 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	28.4% Poor	Memory 42.5 1-Core 45.5 2-Core 83.4 34% 57.1 Pts	4-Core 86.6 8-Core 74.1 11% 80.3 Pts	64-Core 88 5% 88 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD320 128GB-$92 1,687 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.6.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 89 100 92 88 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	Read 115 Write 108 Mixed 135 SusWrite 92.4 25% 113 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 12.3 4K Mixed 21.4 60% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 29.9 DQ Write 95 DQ Mixed 37.3 36% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 62%
Samsung SP1624N 160GB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 25GB free Firmware: UZ100-03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 40 42 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 47 Write 47.2 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 41.1 30% 41.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4.5 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 4.2 9% 3.13 GB/s	Latency 191 21% 191 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	10x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	7x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	9x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16