Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H270M-Gaming3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180410
Uptime	9.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 04 '19 at 14:36
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7500-$89 149,467 User benchmarks, average bench 67% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 87.1 1-Core 106 2-Core 217 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 392 8-Core 380 52% 386 Pts	64-Core 388 24% 388 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 78%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
MZMTD128HAFV-000L3 128GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT44L3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 34 34 35 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	31.1% Below average	Read 431 Write 30.2 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 33.5 29% 138 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.9 44% 9.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 52%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46 218,164 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 394GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 78 78 79 79 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 72.5 Write 58.3 Mixed 47 SusWrite 77.7 47% 63.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 62%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41 64,201 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 654GB free Firmware: DEMD SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 85 85 84 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 83.2 Write 76.2 Mixed 48.7 SusWrite 84 54% 73 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 65%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 400GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 151 153 153 153 153 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Read 162 Write 142 Mixed 40 SusWrite 151 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB 46,470 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.3% Very good	MC Read 26.4 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 21.7 72% 25.2 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 19.9 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	35x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	34x
Core i7-7700KIntel $248Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	31x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	18x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
S3 512G 512GBSandiskBench 96%, 10,855 samples	5x
PLUS 120GBSandiskBench 43%, 16,974 samples	4x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	5x
KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G KHX2666C15D4/4G KHX2400C15D4/4G 16GBKingstonBench 82%, 206 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16