MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7968
MotherboardMSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION  (all builds)
Memory56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '19 at 21:18
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 96%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$219
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 177
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 806
77% 636 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.8% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 115
Parallax 111
87% 111 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 86
Splatting 93
74% 90.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,918
Write 1,869
Mixed 952
420% 1,913 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 49.1
164% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 789
DQ Write 661
DQ Mixed 701
532% 717 MB/s
Poor: 115% Great: 372%
Crucial MX200 1TB-$270
870GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 384 381 390 392 390 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Read 308
Write 367
Mixed 278
SusWrite 385
76% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 33.6
124% 46 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 130
104% 143 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 104%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
77GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 239 234 262 241 254 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.1% Good
Read 480
Write 257
Mixed 249
SusWrite 247
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 82.7
4K Mixed 15.7
98% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 23.6
44% 87.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$90
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 101 102 102 100 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 150
Write 142
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 101
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 88%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 179 177 179 175 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 162
Mixed 90
SusWrite 177
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 101%
SAMSUNG HD103SJ 1TB
719GB free, PID 0569
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 125 125 123 125 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 135
Write 146
Mixed 69
SusWrite 126
159% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
129% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
78.6% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION(MS-7968) Builds (Compare 513 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback