Asrock FM2A88M Pro3+

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A88M Pro3+ (all builds)
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140922
Uptime	12.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 03 '19 at 13:22
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	57% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 75.5 2-Core 138 58% 96.6 Pts	4-Core 224 8-Core 224 30% 224 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200 83,027 User benchmarks, average bench 33% XFX(1682 9380) CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.1 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	34.8% Below average	Lighting 43.3 Reflection 49.8 Parallax 52.2 35% 48.5 fps	MRender 49.8 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 36.3 34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 34.8% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssd2sc12 0G1SA754D117-551 120GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: N111 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 380 Write 317 Mixed 278 72% 325 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 36.7 93% 24.5 MB/s	DQ Read 234 DQ Write 214 DQ Mixed 168 141% 205 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 85%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150 34,842 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 27GB free Firmware: DXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 351 350 349 131 89 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Read 394 Write 368 Mixed 289 SusWrite 269 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 38.1 142% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 124 125% 201 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 110%
Toshiba MK3275GSX 320GB 4,670 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 157GB free Firmware: GT001U SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 68 72 70 75 76 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 75.6 Write 66.3 Mixed 20.7 SusWrite 72.5 43% 58.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 50% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D18ADS3.16FE 1x8GB 866 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.5% Poor	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 7.2 SC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.27 GB/s	Latency 89 45% 89 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 39%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A88M Pro3+ Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88M Pro3+

CPU
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	6x
A10-7860K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $175Bench 43%, 12,658 samples	5x
Athlon X4 845AMD $50Bench 45%, 6,391 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	6x
GTX 670Nvidia $435Bench 28%, 47,610 samples	5x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x

SSD
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	5x
M700 120GBHPBench 71%, 1,660 samples	4x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	3x

RAM
DDR3 1866 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GBUnknownBench 45%, 14 samples	3x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 3,923 samples	2x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x4GBG.SKILLBench 61%, 6,123 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16