Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2617M 268 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	39.3% Below average	Memory 64.6 1-Core 27 2-Core 51.2 33% 47.6 Pts	4-Core 78 8-Core 116 12% 96.8 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39.3% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Dell(1028 04C8) 2GB Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 4.65 Parallax 1.19 1% 2.51 fps	MRender 2.52 Gravity 0.97 Splatting 3.26 2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 351GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 483 473 495 484 399 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 6GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 9.9 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	38x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	21x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	5x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 40%, 8,137 samples	6x
HMT41GS6MFR8C-H9 2x8GBHynixBench 43%, 63 samples	5x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	3x