Asus P8H61-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130918
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateApr 02 '19 at 23:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 92.4
2-Core 185
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 337
8-Core 302
44% 319 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.3.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.8% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 65
37% 57.4 fps
MRender 62.3
Gravity 50
Splatting 53
45% 55.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.8%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 527ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 108 112 106 110 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 182
Write 128
Mixed 138
SusWrite 110
31% 139 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 25.4
86% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 27.6
DQ Write 77.5
DQ Mixed 32.1
30% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-017.A00LF KHX1600C10D3/8G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.1
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE Builds (Compare 1,016 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE - $134

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $211
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback