Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70 2,721 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	33.4% Below average	Memory 60.9 1-Core 19.1 2-Core 31.3 28% 37.1 Pts	4-Core 37.7 8-Core 37.6 5% 37.7 Pts	64-Core 47.4 3% 47.4 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9300M GS 2,044 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3A24) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.1 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.6% Terrible	Lighting 0.63 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 0.28 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.23 Splatting 0.74 1% 0.97 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.6% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2320B 320GB 70 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0009 SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 27 17 37 45 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	22.8% Poor	Read 43.5 Write 37.5 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 35.6 27% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 85% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	12% Very poor	MC Read 4.1 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 3.3 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.2 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.43 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM