MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateApr 01 '19 at 19:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 76.2
1-Core 126
2-Core 241
81% 148 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 712
73% 591 Pts
64-Core 978
60% 978 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.67
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 47.4
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 44.3
39% 48.5 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 47.4
Splatting 61.8
48% 59 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 42%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial C300-MTFDBAK128MAG 128GB
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 98 90 105 106 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 254
Write 137
Mixed 161
SusWrite 97.4
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 58
4K Mixed 13
70% 28.7 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 81.8
82% 133 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 52%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
345GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 454 456 450 448 392 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 450
Mixed 435
SusWrite 438
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 45.3
159% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 366
DQ Mixed 301
247% 351 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
WD WD10JPLX-00MBPT0 1TB
818GB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 130 127 124 125 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 126
71% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$35
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.7% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 26.1
78% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 23.1
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO (MS-7B79) - $112

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $631
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback