Asus X550VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
9 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemAsus X550VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X550VC
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131016
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 15:21
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i5-3340M
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
44.6% Average
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 131
53% 108 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 203
28% 204 Pts
64-Core 205
14% 205 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.6%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Asus(1043 124D) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5059
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 16
Parallax 10
2% 11.2 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 19.2
2% 12.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.46%
Great: 3%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 MAX IOPS 120GB-$154
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 65 131 166 169 173 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 329
Write 187
Mixed 200
SusWrite 134
47% 212 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 24.3
77% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 153
130% 191 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55%
Great: 88%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
312GB free
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 35 62 62 63 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 48.2
Write 56.9
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 54.3
33% 45.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$4
1GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.1 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.4 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Read 3
Write 2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 2.2
3% 2.35 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron MT8KTF51264HZ-1G6 Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.7
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 55%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X550VC Builds (Compare 403 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus X550VC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $306
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $218Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $42
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $384Nvidia RTX 2060 $340Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $204
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $42Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $63SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $653SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback