HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 304Ah
Memory6.1 GB free of 8.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 11:07
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 74
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 153
61% 104 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 202
27% 204 Pts
64-Core 211
13% 211 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
MSI(1462 809F) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.83% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 1.84
2% 2.33 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 1.83
2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.83%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2CV102HA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 74 80 79 78 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 214
Write 78.6
Mixed 109
SusWrite 78.1
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 9.1
42% 14.3 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 71
63% 96.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 44%
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
295GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 76.1
Write 55.7
Mixed 45.3
SusWrite 75.3
46% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F 44GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.1% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 12.4
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.3
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 92.4
43% 92.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 25%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8100 Elite SFF PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback