Asus T300CHI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive8.39% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemAsus T300CHI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK T300CHI
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150212
Uptime17.6 Days
Run DateMar 31 '19 at 10:07
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 100%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core M-5Y10c
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
24.8% Poor
Memory 42.6
1-Core 22.3
2-Core 22.2
22% 29 Pts
4-Core 40
8-Core 70.4
7% 55.2 Pts
64-Core 27.2
2% 27.2 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Core M HD 5300
Asus(1043 18FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 3.58
Parallax 5.28
3% 4.29 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 5.87
3% 3.81 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk i110 128GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: i221000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 32 37 82 78 91 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
8.39% Terrible
Read 69.8
Write 41.6
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 58
11% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 2.8
6% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 8.39%
Great: 45%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 483GB
351GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 31.3
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 28.3
22% 29.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 5
891% 5.53 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 101%
Lexar JD FireFly 8GB
7GB free, PID a810
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 5.5 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Read 17.2
Write 5.5
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 5.3
10% 8.43 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 6%
SDXC Card 128GB
110GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 18 23 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
8.83% Terrible
Read 23.3
Write 14.5
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 17
23% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 8.83%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
20% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 1.8
SC Mixed 0.5
4% 1.6 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical T300CHI Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus T300CHI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback