Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming K3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 30 '19 at 13:39
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8350K-$139
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 517
8-Core 513
69% 515 Pts
64-Core 518
32% 518 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Gigabyte(1458 3771) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2247 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
65.2% Good
Lighting 81.5
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 69.7
66% 77.7 fps
MRender 79.8
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 77
63% 76.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 55 1.8 102 78 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 428
Write 294
Mixed 296
SusWrite 73.5
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 19.7
81% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 41.3
47% 81.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 52%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
555GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 179 178 153 153 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 176
Mixed 105
SusWrite 165
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown IR2400D464L15S/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
74% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 21.8
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 74%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF Builds (Compare 1,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming K3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $515
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback