Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateAug 28 '16 at 10:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$125
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 87.9
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 141
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 389
38% 313 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Nvidia(10DE 089C) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
9.98% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 9.41
9% 11.2 fps
MRender 15.5
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 15.2
12% 14.2 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.98%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
760GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 90
Mixed 90.6
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.75
4K Mixed 0.32
86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 51%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
230GB free
Firmware: CC96 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 119
Write 77.8
Mixed 89.6
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.21
48% 0.32 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
45% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 45%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0 Builds (Compare 1,729 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 6.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback