Asus K53SV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus K53SV  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K53SV
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111111
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateMar 29 '19 at 12:55
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 66
2-Core 131
58% 94 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 337
34% 277 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Asus(1043 15F2) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8873
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 4.46
Parallax 1.94
3% 3.38 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3
3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 49 13 88 73 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 390
Write 122
Mixed 181
SusWrite 82.5
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 16.6
4K Mixed 11
45% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 84.6
DQ Mixed 31.8
42% 77.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 53734xxxx78x65F3xx 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.5
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 6.2
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K53SV Builds (Compare 586 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K53SV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback