Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime4 Days
Run DateAug 28 '16 at 01:50
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 222
83% 144 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 569
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Asus(1043 84B8) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6869
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 17.8
16% 17.4 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 14.7
Splatting 16
14% 17.8 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 184
Mixed 170
134% 178 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.22
85% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
JMicron Generic 1TB
931GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 117
Write 113
Mixed 67.1
122% 98.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 0.58
209% 2.24 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 222%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.1
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 63.3
63% 63.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,190 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $334
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback