Lenovo 20FNCTO1WW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20FNCTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FNCTO1WW
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 27 '16 at 20:53
Run Duration59 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 153
64% 107 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 225
26% 202 Pts
64-Core 237
15% 237 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5053) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.27
Reflection 8.23
Parallax 5.47
4% 6.32 fps
MRender 4.62
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 11.4
6% 7.01 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Micron 16KTF2G64HZ-1G6A1 24GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 13.1
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20FNCTO1WW Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20FNCTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $52
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback