Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 82% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 69% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	82.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190118
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '19 at 16:15
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.3% Outstanding	Memory 96 1-Core 127 2-Core 250 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 501 8-Core 704 76% 602 Pts	64-Core 725 45% 725 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 94.3% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% MSI(1462 3681) CLim: 1702 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.3.1 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Lighting 97.5 Reflection 90.2 Parallax 140 80% 109 fps	MRender 87.3 Gravity 103 Splatting 124 88% 105 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 849GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 339 361 387 390 392 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 472 Write 398 Mixed 194 SusWrite 366 80% 358 MB/s	4K Read 35.5 4K Write 86.7 4K Mixed 38.7 149% 53.6 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 242 DQ Mixed 104 131% 235 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 126%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$30 27,212 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 925GB free Firmware: ST6OA3AA SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 103 109 108 109 109 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 112 Write 111 Mixed 52 SusWrite 108 70% 95.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$37 606,405 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 35.3 MC Mixed 27.1 95% 33.2 GB/s	SC Read 20.3 SC Write 33.4 SC Mixed 27.9 78% 27.2 GB/s	Latency 54 74% 54 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,323 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,517x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	836x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	574x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	402x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	342x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $37Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	84x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $639

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16