ADD TO PC
BUILD

Supermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	8.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	61.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9QR7-TF+/X9QRi-F+
Memory	16.5 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150520
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '19 at 03:05
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-4650 0 86 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 4 CPU, 32 cores, 64 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 83.4 1-Core 71.1 2-Core 143 60% 99.2 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 568 52% 433 Pts	64-Core 3,043 188% 3,043 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112 69,673 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Zotac(19DA 1294) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 327.23 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	8.39% Terrible	Lighting 9.6 Reflection 9.04 Parallax 9.78 8% 9.47 fps	MRender 13.1 Gravity 8.93 Splatting 12.5 10% 11.5 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.39% Great: 9%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199 19,348 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 145 144 147 144 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	61.5% Good	Read 396 Write 158 Mixed 217 SusWrite 144 51% 229 MB/s	4K Read 24.5 4K Write 38.5 4K Mixed 25.6 90% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 188 144% 197 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 88%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB 2,552 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 00ee Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 3.9 4.6 2.7 2.8 3.8 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	4.63% Terrible	Read 19.8 Write 2.3 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 3.2 8% 8.02 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.63% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-CMA Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 M391B1G73QH0-CMA Hynix HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 20GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 2048, 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	23.4% Poor	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 5.6 21% 7.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 4.6 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 74.4 54% 74.4 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback