bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
System
MotherboardIntel DQ77MK
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120504
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMar 27 '19 at 01:53
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$137
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 155
69% 113 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 464
45% 370 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 421.65
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 71.5
Parallax 70.3
58% 71.1 fps
MRender 79.1
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 71
60% 73.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 39 29 20 31 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 37% Great: 94%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39
826GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 116 118 119 118 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 111
Write 117
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate Ultra Slim PL 2TB
828GB free
Firmware: 0108
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 28.8
Write 22.5
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 25.9
19% 25.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
174% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTBJTF51264AZ-1G6E 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,430 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback