Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	30.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99X Killer (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20150417
Uptime	35 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '19 at 04:27
Run Duration	304 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 104 2-Core 206 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 652 65% 529 Pts	64-Core 800 50% 800 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% EVGA(3842 3962) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.3% Below average	Lighting 45 Reflection 44.9 Parallax 39.8 37% 43.3 fps	MRender 34 Gravity 40.9 Splatting 0.13 18% 25 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 480GB 58,990 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 229GB free (System drive) Firmware: UG4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 3.9 39 22 3.3 4.1 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 439 Write 359 Mixed 287 SusWrite 31.4 62% 279 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 18.5 62% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 40.4 DQ Write 13.1 DQ Mixed 1.2 8% 18.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 17GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 492 Write 473 Mixed 357 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 57 190% 66.5 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 282 DQ Mixed 284 218% 295 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$63 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 47.5 Write 49 Mixed 40.5 34% 45.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.5 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 21GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 86 82 79 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 49 Write 84 Mixed 64.3 SusWrite 82 52% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.5 190% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 87%
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154 3,810 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 12GB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 140 139 145 121 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	80% Very good	Read 140 Write 140 Mixed 54.5 SusWrite 138 86% 118 MB/s	4K Read 2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1.1 244% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 110%
SanDisk Extreme SSD 1TB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 187% 880GB free, PID 558c Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 308 304 306 304 302 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	311% Outstanding	Read 307 Write 310 Mixed 270 SusWrite 306 407% 298 MB/s	4K Read 26.9 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 30.3 3,270% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 27.2 DQ Write 74.2 DQ Mixed 34.6 3,802% 45.3 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 311% Great: 342%
WDC WD60 EZRZ-00GZ5B1 6TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 7.6 7.7 7.7 7.8 8.1 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 139 Write 146 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 7.9 118% 93.7 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 130% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 65%
WDC WD30 EZRX-00DC0B0 3TB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 4GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 67.5 Write 66.7 Mixed 43 74% 59.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 112% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 56%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB 104 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 31 Write 74 Mixed 31 63% 45.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 71%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 8GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 61 61 61 62 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	27.8% Poor	Read 58 Write 59.5 Mixed 44.5 SusWrite 61.5 76% 55.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 54%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB 1,144 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 67GB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 48.3 Write 79.8 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 96.5 100% 69 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.7 4K Mixed 0.5 215% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 72%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB 1,841 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 7TB free, PID ab38 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 89 87 88 90 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Read 63.5 Write 108 Mixed 60 SusWrite 87.4 113% 79.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.9 206% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234 3,507 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	96.4% Outstanding	MC Read 37.5 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 34.2 106% 37.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 20.2 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 65.5 61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 96.4% Great: 117%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 269 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 84%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 75%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	148x
Core i7-5930KIntel $150Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	45x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	25x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	24x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	20x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	18x
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x

RAM
BL8G36C16U4BL.M8FE1 2x8GBUnknownBench 96%, 5,257 samples	12x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 87%, 2,702 samples	9x
DDR4 2800 2OZ 4x8GBUnknownBench 86%, 829 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 112% - Outstanding

Total price: $718

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16