Asus GL552VX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAsus GL552VX  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL552VX
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160914
Uptime31 Days
Run DateMar 26 '19 at 02:22
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 169
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 350
46% 346 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 1060) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1735
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15.5
Reflection 12
Parallax 12.4
13% 13.3 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 13.1
13% 16.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
m.2 Smartbuy S11-2280 128GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 176 188 199 118 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Read 49.4
Write 299
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 139
29% 127 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 13.9
47% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 128
130% 205 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 105%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB
465GB free
Firmware: JA0OA560
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 81 79 81 79 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 46.2
Write 43
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 79.4
34% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB0-CPB 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL552VX Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus GL552VX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback