Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (98th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 2 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190304
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 20:51
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 80.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 181
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 626
58% 486 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Lighting 38.2
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 46
31% 39.5 fps
MRender 29.9
Gravity 33.4
Splatting 38.8
28% 34.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 205
Write 195
Mixed 101
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 1.3
260% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 45% Great: 207%
Amd-raid TOSHIBA MQ01ABD1 1TB
30GB free
Firmware: AX00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,724
Write 38.2
Mixed 58.8
1,150% 1,607 MB/s
4K Read 493
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.9
20,753% 165 MB/s
Poor: 25% Great: 62%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 16GB
15GB free, PID 007a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24.1
Write 8
Mixed 9.5
15% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-16-16 D4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 30.2
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 25.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $413
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback