Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 20:14
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$59
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 93.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 236
87% 152 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 510
66% 500 Pts
64-Core 507
31% 507 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
Gigabyte(1458 22E8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1290 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.12.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 57.3
Reflection 67
Parallax 85.5
47% 69.9 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 54
48% 60 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
102GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 625 307 306 301 299 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,424
Write 1,462
Mixed 984
SusWrite 356
288% 1,306 MB/s
4K Read 63.3
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 90.5
306% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 973
DQ Write 1,490
DQ Mixed 1,005
824% 1,156 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 268%
Great: 280%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 173 171 171 175 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 151
Mixed 109
SusWrite 172
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
230% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 100%
Great: 108%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
103GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 104 100 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 95.5
Write 97.5
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 102
69% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
399GB free
Firmware: 01.01S01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 101 103 104 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.8
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 103
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
215% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 76%
USB Flash Disk 1GB
1GB free, PID 2168
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.9 9 9.1 9.3 9.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
5.68% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 8.7
Mixed 8.9
SusWrite 9.1
12% 9.3 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
45% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.68%
Great: 6%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
15GB free, PID 0745
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 12 12 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
6.42% Terrible
Read 10.2
Write 9.9
Mixed 10.9
SusWrite 11.3
15% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.42%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 28.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $805
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback