Asus X99-E WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus X99-E WS  (all builds)
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 25 '19 at 15:38
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 91.1
2-Core 178
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 646
57% 481 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 24.4
Parallax 30.2
19% 25.8 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 25
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lacie 2big Dock Thunde 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 1153
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 361
Write 309
Mixed 128
59% 266 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 3.5
19% 6.77 MB/s
DQ Read 6.5
DQ Write 11.6
DQ Mixed 3.4
4% 7.17 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 45%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 443
Mixed 374
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 47.5
162% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 347
262% 351 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
43GB free
Firmware: 608ABBF0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 405
Write 266
Mixed 281
70% 317 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 39.1
136% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 219
166% 221 MB/s
Poor: 54% Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
219GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 151
Write 135
Mixed 88.8
93% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
214% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 2TB
87GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 165
Write 140
Mixed 86.8
158% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
61% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 79%
ST3000DM 001-9YN166 802GB
16GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 82.5
132% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 1866 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
110% Outstanding
MC Read 47.5
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 39.4
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 20.8
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 110%
Great: 141%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-E WS Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-E WS - $473

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $953
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback