| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.2 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070118 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 25 '19 at 09:02 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dual Core AMD Opteron 170
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
|
43.7%
Average
|
42% 61.9 Pts
|
10% 71.8 Pts
|
5% 73.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1360 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.1.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.3%
Below average
|
25% 55 fps
|
52% 64.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intenso SATA III SSD 120GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 56 23 28 23 21 MB/s
|
25.8%
Poor
|
20% 89.1 MB/s
|
55% 15.5 MB/s
|
17% 31.8 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 32GB-$8
26GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 17 17 18 18 18 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
24% 19.3 MB/s
|
140% 2.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 512, 1024, 1024 MB
|
12.8%
Very poor
|
10% 3.4 GB/s
|
11% 3.77 GB/s
|
45% 89.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,602 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 720x |
| Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 281x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 267x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 619x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 461x |
| G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples | 361x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $87 |