Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory29.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180321
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 23:19
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$599
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 263
91% 163 Pts
4-Core 526
8-Core 876
85% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,093
68% 1,093 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.7% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 114
Parallax 95.8
82% 103 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 96.4
Splatting 101
81% 98.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.6.8341
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 221 234 224 208 223 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1464
Write 1,115
Mixed 868
SusWrite 239
205% 922 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 70.9
235% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 565
455% 649 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 177%
Great: 159%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 370 324 322 320 324 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 470
Mixed 390
SusWrite 352
95% 424 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 56.7
195% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 344
262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 117%
Great: 123%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 370 324 323 321 325 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 469
Mixed 380
SusWrite 353
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 62
203% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 332
DQ Mixed 343
261% 353 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 121%
Great: 123%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 121 121 122 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 140
Write 149
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 123
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2133C15-8GNT F4-2133C15-8GNT F4-2400C15-8GNT F4-2133C15-8GIS 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 37.2
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 23.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 100%
This bench: 108%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,074 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $1,390
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback