Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemSamsung 700Z3C/700Z5C  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 700Z3C/700Z5C
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120426
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 21:26
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3615QM
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 128
56% 91.1 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 312
33% 265 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D5) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2618
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.79% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 3.03
3% 4.12 fps
MRender 5.9
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.17
5% 5.52 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
656GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2AR1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 87 94 89 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 94.3
Mixed 44.8
SusWrite 86.2
58% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 04CB AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
54.9% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 18
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 700Z3C/700Z5C Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 700Z3C/700Z5C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback