IBM 49Y6498

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	IBM 49Y6498 (all builds)
Memory	51.8 GB free of 56 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090820
Uptime	2.2 Days
Run Date	Mar 23 '19 at 21:20
Run Duration	190 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	30%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5506 633 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 39.4 1-Core 41.7 2-Core 81.4 32% 54.2 Pts	4-Core 192 8-Core 348 32% 270 Pts	64-Core 410 25% 410 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 59 74 61 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	37% Below average	Read 61 Write 64.5 Mixed 29.2 SusWrite 67.6 41% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37% Great: 70%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 362GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 56 46 60 46 56 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 30.2 Write 36.7 Mixed 19.5 SusWrite 53.3 26% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 63%
External USB3.0 2TB 286 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1TB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 6.9 6.7 6.4 6.6 6.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Read 7 Write 6.5 Mixed 6.8 SusWrite 6.6 5% 6.72 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 95%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 35GB free Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 6.5 11 8.7 5.8 6.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	4.49% Terrible	Read 7.3 Write 4.7 Mixed 7.5 SusWrite 8.3 5% 6.95 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 4.49% Great: 63%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 19 16 23 13 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.71% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 40.3 Mixed 26.5 SusWrite 18.9 19% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 9.71% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 7x8GB 78 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 7 of 16 slots used 56GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	17.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 5 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.8 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 2.8 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 205 20% 205 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 49Y6498 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: IBM 49Y6498

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	1x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

IBM 49Y6498

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: IBM 49Y6498

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)