HP HPE-599uk

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive50.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP HPE-599uk  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AB6
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110504
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 19:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$187
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 158
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 392
42% 332 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
CLim: 1070 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.3.3
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
29.2% Poor
Lighting 36.6
Reflection 33.4
Parallax 44.5
30% 38.2 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 38.6
28% 33.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-GSTFS31480GNTD 480GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 114 112 96 90 93 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
50.5% Above average
Read 219
Write 209
Mixed 198
SusWrite 112
41% 184 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 40.2
4K Mixed 24.3
86% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 152
125% 178 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 98%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 112 111 111 112 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 116
Write 113
Mixed 83
SusWrite 111
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 CMZ12GX3M3A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.6% Average
MC Read 14
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback