Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics61.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive128% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '19 at 18:56
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690K-$50
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 96.3
1-Core 122
2-Core 262
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 522
69% 518 Pts
64-Core 525
32% 525 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2277 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.1% Good
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 65.1
61% 71.2 fps
MRender 80.6
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 73
61% 75.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 315 318 321 323 323 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 490
Mixed 414
SusWrite 328
98% 435 MB/s
4K Read 49.8
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 66.8
229% 81.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 128%
Great: 124%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
36GB free
Firmware: 2.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 61 62 57 58 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 192
Write 62.5
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 60
22% 102 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 61.1
4K Mixed 30.2
116% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 66.1
DQ Write 63.2
DQ Mixed 58.6
46% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 51%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151
556GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 122 124 124 125 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 138
Write 113
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 124
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1
212% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
15GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 66 56 72 59 64 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 52.3
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 63.2
44% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
72.9% Very good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 23.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 22.2
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 53
75% 53 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $925
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback