Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka) 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 35% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 68.2 1-Core 70.1 2-Core 107 51% 81.6 Pts	4-Core 110 8-Core 108 15% 109 Pts	64-Core 110 7% 110 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Nvidia(10DE 1117) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.33 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.26% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.96 Parallax 3.5 3% 4.19 fps	MRender 4.52 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.09 3% 3.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.26% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543225A7A384 250GB 2,305 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 175GB free (System drive) Firmware: ESBOA60W SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 55 33 46 59 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	23.5% Poor	Read 35 Write 48.8 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 46.7 31% 41.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.1% Poor	MC Read 11.1 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 11.3 28% 9.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 9.9 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 106 38% 106 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 60%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 7480DAMDBench 2%, 8,289 samples	18x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	12x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16