| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Supermicro X9DR3-F (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Supermicro X9DR3-F |
| Memory | 61.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150709 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 25 '16 at 01:04 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
59.7%
Above average
|
58% 106 Pts
|
58% 490 Pts
|
101% 1,631 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD FirePro W7100
AMD(1002 030C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.2601.0
Performing below potential (80th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
31.2%
Below average
|
31% 43.8 fps
|
31% 38.6 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
52% 232 MB/s
|
63% 19.3 MB/s
|
32% 62.4 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36JDYS1G72PZ- 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
86.2%
Excellent
|
101% 35.5 GB/s
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
29% 139 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X9DR3-F Builds (Compare 52 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Supermicro X9DR3-F
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 7x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v21stBench 58%, 1,402 samples | 6x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 66%, 741 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 4x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $59 |