Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '19 at 06:47
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8370E-$471
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 93.8
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 108
56% 85.5 Pts
4-Core 196
8-Core 351
33% 274 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
XFX(1682 9580) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1450 MHz, MLim: 2025 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.4.4
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 61.4
Reflection 73.6
Parallax 96.6
50% 77.2 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 58.9
55% 68.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$39
211GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 404 401 417 414 244 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 416
Mixed 415
SusWrite 365
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 68
4K Mixed 43.3
141% 47.9 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 223
174% 239 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 123%
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
264GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 134 134 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 135
Write 135
Mixed 94
SusWrite 133
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.3
257% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 79%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 16GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 13 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 21
Write 16.5
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 13.8
23% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.7
152% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 11%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 16.2
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $289Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback