TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1440 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 17:28
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Memory 89
1-Core 121
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 727
77% 612 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑
This bench: 90.8%
 Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85AB)
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
58.4% Above average
Lighting 73.4
Reflection 74
Parallax 71
60% 72.8 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 67.8
Splatting 67.5
56% 68 fps
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 58.4%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 91 100 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 376
Write 127
Mixed 183
SusWrite 88.2
42% 193 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 39.1
148% 56.8 MB/s
DQ Read 92.7
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 102
79% 107 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 70.9%
 Great: 73%
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
165GB free
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 159 89 88 94 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 490
Write 452
Mixed 362
SusWrite 144
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 39.6
142% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 184
170% 261 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 85.6%
 Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.5
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 35.2
115% 40.1 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 29.8
92% 32.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 110%
 Great: 110%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 4,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B85) - $166

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $81Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples882x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD  $190Bench 76%, 159,077 samples525x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD  $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples508x
GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples323x
RX 5700-XTAMD  $250Bench 98%, 254,908 samples280x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $273Bench 90%, 645,160 samples271x
SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples154x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples145x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples123x
RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples256x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples235x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples187x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback