| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 4.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 70.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Run History
5 years ago, 3 years ago.
| System | Toshiba Satellite S855D (all builds) |
| Motherboard | TOSHIBA Portable PC |
| Memory | 5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20121203 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 21 '19 at 15:30 |
| Run Duration | 120 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMD A10-4600M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
|
47.8%
Average
|
45% 68.1 Pts
|
18% 137 Pts
|
9% 140 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
4.78%
Terrible
|
5% 6.22 fps
|
5% 5.88 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage 240GB-$117
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 286 287 278 307 329 MB/s
|
70.8%
Very good
|
76% 336 MB/s
|
90% 32.5 MB/s
|
92% 172 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston TSB1600D3S1ELD/4GE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.2%
Below average
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
21% 7.3 GB/s
|
42% 94.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Satellite S855D Builds (Compare 9 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Toshiba Satellite S855D
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 12% - Very poor | Total price: $74 |