Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 11:36
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 99.6
2-Core 193
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 380
8-Core 373
50% 377 Pts
64-Core 364
23% 364 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (69 fps cap detected)
56.5% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 68.7
Parallax 60.1
56% 66.1 fps
MRender 70
Gravity 66.6
Splatting 69.7
56% 68.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GSSD220S 120GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFR21.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 176 188 205 177 220 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 396
Write 291
Mixed 310
SusWrite 193
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 22.5
93% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 147
146% 229 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
136GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 108 109 107 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 55
SusWrite 108
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
2GB free
Firmware: KC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 68.2
Write 66.5
Mixed 45
45% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
13GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 101 100 102 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 98.2
Write 66
Mixed 70.5
SusWrite 100
62% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57%
Great: 112%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$32
931GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 102 103 101 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 106
Write 99.3
Mixed 77
SusWrite 102
71% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 76%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 320GB
85GB free, PID a001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26% Poor
Read 58.8
Write 60.2
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 58.3
74% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 26%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73QH0-YK0 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 830B M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 830B M2F2G64CB88B7N-CG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.5% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 67.3
60% 67.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $214
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback