Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics32.3% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180301
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 21 '19 at 07:51
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium G4400-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
34% Below average
SC Int 25.3
SC Float 31.4
SC Mixed 35.8
25% 30.8 Pts
QC Int 152
QC Float 199
QC Mixed 194
41% 182 Pts
MC Int 186
MC Float 206
MC Mixed 196
29% 196 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$99
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Lighting 67
Reflection 69.5
Parallax 106
25% 80.8 fps
MRender 82.1
Gravity 104
Splatting 77.2
38% 87.7 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 36%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 12 159 2.2 8.5 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 347
Write 292
Mixed 255
SusWrite 60.1
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 18.4
80% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 159
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 130
114% 166 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$37
40GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 99 99 102 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 176
Write 183
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 100
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown GLJF62F-DA---------- 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21.4
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 20.8
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical H110M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 812 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $491
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $335Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $100
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $275Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $45
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $646SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $75SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback