Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics59.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '16 at 19:22
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 92.9
1-Core 66.3
2-Core 136
62% 98.5 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 328
36% 283 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 71
Reflection 82.3
Parallax 68.6
58% 74 fps
MRender 83
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 76.3
62% 75.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%
AMD R9 390-$325
Gigabyte(1458 22BD) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.300.2311.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Lighting 74.3
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 84.8
61% 75.3 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 59.9
Splatting 83.6
58% 69.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.6% Average
Read 517
Write 108
Mixed 154
56% 259 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 9.63
62% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 23.1
38% 71.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 73%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
740GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Read 110
Write 85.7
Mixed 71.4
66% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.01
4K Mixed 0.17
77% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 84%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
315GB free
Firmware: 2AR20002 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 74.3
Write 68.2
Mixed 79.3
56% 74 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 0.26
71% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 59%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
297GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 85.5
Mixed 88.1
68% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.47
117% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2133C11D3/4GX KHX2133C11D3/4GX KHX2133C11D3/4GX 133C11D3/4GX 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 20.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 14.4
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 848 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback