Acer Aspire E5-474G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire E5-474G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ROBIN_SL
Memory6.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170710
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 14:59
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 83.1
2-Core 151
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 228
30% 228 Pts
64-Core 208
13% 208 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 0975) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.87
Reflection 7.58
Parallax 5.5
5% 6.31 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 11.4
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.36%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1025F8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 216 38 66 79 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 416
Write 361
Mixed 330
SusWrite 84.2
67% 298 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 32.1
110% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 150
118% 166 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 114%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$45
271GB free
Firmware: AX003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 66 65 67 67 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 50.5
Write 53
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 66.3
36% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 0112 78.C2GCZ.9K30C 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-474G Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-474G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback