Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	33% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS R940 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3358-A1
Memory	118.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181009
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '19 at 14:21
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 89.4 2-Core 171 67% 114 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 601 55% 462 Pts	64-Core 1,651 102% 1,651 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 418.81 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	33% Below average	Lighting 39.9 Reflection 39.7 Parallax 36.5 32% 38.7 fps	MRender 50.5 Gravity 36.6 Splatting 39 34% 42 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN512HCHP-00000 512GB 467 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 177GB free (System drive) Firmware: 100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 313 315 315 323 322 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	82.7% Excellent	Read 432 Write 339 Mixed 278 SusWrite 320 77% 342 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 32.4 112% 39.4 MB/s	DQ Read 268 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 227 176% 242 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.7% Great: 119%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690 3,492 User benchmarks, average bench 271% 1.5TB free Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 1088 1088 1170 1166 1163 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	234% Outstanding	Read 2,105 Write 1,220 Mixed 896 SusWrite 1,147 298% 1,342 MB/s	4K Read 40.6 4K Write 88.5 4K Mixed 52 175% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 579 DQ Write 561 DQ Mixed 560 424% 567 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 234% Great: 354%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 203 202 204 202 203 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	88.6% Excellent	Read 108 Write 145 Mixed 50.2 SusWrite 202 92% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.5 102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 88.6% Great: 114%
WD Blue 6TB (2015)-$215 8,416 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 153 151 157 159 154 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	82.5% Excellent	Read 133 Write 135 Mixed 93.5 SusWrite 154 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 97%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 115GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 119 119 118 118 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 163 Write 116 Mixed 84.8 SusWrite 118 155% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 3.9 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 8x16GB 348 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 8 of 16 slots used 128GB DIMM 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	108% Outstanding	MC Read 49.8 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 41.8 122% 42.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 17.6 SC Mixed 19.2 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 131%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS R940 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 48%

Yacht

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS R940

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v31stBench 63%, 481 samples	10x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples	3x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2630 v31stBench 64%, 1,710 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	9x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	5x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	4x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAK512TBN 512GBBench 84%, 2,512 samples	2x

RAM
9ASF1G72PZ-2G6D1 8x8GBMicronBench 92%, 150 samples	7x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	3x
Kingston KHX2666C16/16G 24GBUnknownBench 54%, 9 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $238

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16