Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130829
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 23 '16 at 06:45
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 212
73% 129 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 547
62% 483 Pts
64-Core 546
34% 546 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 3784) 3GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6822
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.6% Average
Lighting 61
Reflection 53.9
Parallax 67.4
50% 60.8 fps
MRender 70.7
Gravity 51.2
Splatting 51.6
46% 57.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Series 500GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 491
Mixed 509
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 35
142% 51.7 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 129
140% 236 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 106%
Great: 89%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 165
Write 118
Mixed 127
102% 136 MB/s
4K Read 0.94
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.47
134% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 32.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 11.8
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,589 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,069
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback