MSI G41M-P33 Combo(MS-7592)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7592
MotherboardMSI G41M-P33 Combo(MS-7592)  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 16:00
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5460-$190
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.25 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Memory 81.4
1-Core 46.2
2-Core 92.9
48% 73.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 185
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
Sapphire(174B E228) 2GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 13.5
8% 11.5 fps
MRender 7.52
Gravity 9
Splatting 10.1
7% 8.88 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$47
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 77 101 101 103 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 56
SusWrite 89.7
66% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.7
SC Mixed 7
19% 6.8 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41M-P33 Combo(MS-7592) Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI G41M-P33 Combo(MS-7592) - $128

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback