PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Micro-Star MS-7A34 |
Motherboard | MSI B350 PC MATE(MS-7A34) (all builds) |
Memory | 11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170316 |
Uptime | 0.3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 17 '19 at 03:28 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
70.8%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 278 276 273 272 268 MB/s
|
169%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
28GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 287 236 218 197 187 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 85 85 82 88 87 MB/s
|
48%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROU 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples | 88x |
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 33x |
Ryzen 5 1500XAMD $131Bench 66%, 70,038 samples | 32x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 39x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 25x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $321 |