PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 6.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
Boot Drive | 15.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Z600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0B54h |
Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130715 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '19 at 20:49 |
Run Duration | 122 Seconds |
Run User | ALB-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5620
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
64.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
|
6.36%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z320
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 13 60 93 81 MB/s
|
15.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
218GB free
Firmware: JP1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 127 126 124 125 MB/s
|
71.7%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M393B1K70DH0-CK0 50GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 34816 MB
|
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples | 303x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 58%, 5,965 samples | 282x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples | 259x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 150x |
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 130x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 129x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 100x |
A400 480GBKingston $30Bench 74%, 237,487 samples | 55x |
240G 240GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 67%, 8,659 samples | 36x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 90% - Excellent | Total price: $84 |