Asus Z8NA-D6(C)

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z8NA-D6(C) (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1768 x 992 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110706
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '19 at 14:52
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650 7,756 User benchmarks, average bench 64% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 83.7 1-Core 67.7 2-Core 149 60% 100 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 459 42% 353 Pts	64-Core 1,038 64% 1,038 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 480-$500 3,874 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Nvidia(10DE 075F) 1.5GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 924 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	20.2% Poor	Lighting 23.1 Reflection 36.1 Parallax 26 19% 28.4 fps	MRender 38.3 Gravity 19.3 Splatting 27.5 23% 28.4 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.2% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 113GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 66 2.1 50 19 114 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	27.1% Poor	Read 190 Write 173 Mixed 150 SusWrite 70.3 33% 146 MB/s	4K Read 12.2 4K Write 19.1 4K Mixed 13.6 46% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 16.7 DQ Write 20.6 DQ Mixed 17.8 14% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36 203,102 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 431GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 134 Write 133 Mixed 55.2 SusWrite 73 72% 98.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 70%
Toshiba MK6465GSX 640GB 4,539 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 388GB free Firmware: GJ003A SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 68.7 Write 65.2 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 73 46% 62.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	41.4% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 12.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 74 54% 74 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z8NA-D6(C) Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z8NA-D6(C)

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	43x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	17x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	17x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	9x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x

SSD
RBU-SC152DS3764GG 64GBKingstonBench 59%, 13 samples	10x
MX500 250GBCrucial $39Bench 101%, 77,177 samples	4x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	3x

RAM
6x8GBUnknownBench 53%, 2,890 samples	31x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	15x
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $92

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16